Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit f3f9367e authored by Sigurd Hagen Tullander's avatar Sigurd Hagen Tullander
Browse files

Siste

parent 525f5299
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
No preview for this file type
\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
We have investigated possibilities and potential for saving energy consumption of the short read alignment process of a SWARAM workflow. The research is done in a practically oriented manner, focused on quantifying the results. In short, we have found out that it is possible to up to $12.8 \%$ of the total energy consumption of a typical alignment process, at the cost of up to $23.5 \%$ longer runtime. These results are achieved only from varying the frequency of one of the Odroid-XU4's 2 VFIs, the Cortex-A15 processor. The other VFI, the Cortex-A7, has diminishing DVFS potential in comparison to the A15. For the A15, the most energy effective frequency is $1.1 \Ghertz$, while the highest and most time effective frequency is $2.0 \Ghertz$. In addition to achieving these quantitative results, we have described and implemented an algorithm that uses these results, together with a runtime estimate, to calculate the most energy effective frequency which lets BWA-MEM finish aligning a set of short reads against a reference genome before a given deadline.
We have investigated possibilities and potential for saving energy consumption of the short read alignment process of a SWARAM workflow. The research is done in a practically oriented manner, focused on quantifying the results. In short, we have found out that it is possible to up to $12.8 \%$ of the total energy consumption of a typical alignment process, at the cost of up to $23.5 \%$ longer runtime. These results are achieved only from varying the frequency of one of the Odroid-XU4's 2 VFIs, the Cortex-A15 processor. The other VFI, the Cortex-A7, has diminishing DVFS potential in comparison to the A15. For the A15, the most energy effective frequency is $1.1 \Ghertz$, while the highest and most time effective frequency is $2.0 \Ghertz$. In addition to achieving these quantitative results, we have described and implemented an algorithm that uses these results, together with a runtime estimate, to calculate the most energy effective frequency which lets BWA-MEM finish aligning a set of short reads against a reference genome partition before a given deadline.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment